ClareNow
Search
ClareNow
Toggle sidebar
Mobile → Neutral

I Tested the Motorola Razr Fold and Razr Ultra Cameras at the World Cup. Here's the Winner

With Motorola serving as the World Cup's official smartphone partner, I couldn't resist snapping some photos on its latest foldables.

CNET 2 min read 4/10
I Tested the Motorola Razr Fold and Razr Ultra Cameras at the World Cup. Here's the Winner
Key Takeaways
  • The Motorola Razr Ultra wins the camera comparison with a 50MP main sensor and dedicated 2x telephoto lens, outperforming the Razr Fold’s 64MP sensor in zoom and low light.
  • At the World Cup, the Razr Ultra captured sports action with faster autofocus and better colour accuracy than the Razr Fold, according to CNET’s hands-on testing.
  • Motorola’s role as official smartphone partner of the World Cup placed its foldables in front of thousands of users, providing real-world validation for foldable camera performance.
  • The Razr Ultra’s optical image stabilisation and wider aperture (f/1.8 vs f/1.9 on the Fold) contributed to sharper night shots under stadium floodlights.
  • The Razr Fold retails at roughly $700, while the Ultra costs $1,000, making the camera upgrade a key differentiator for buyers deciding between the two models.
Motorola’s latest foldables went head-to-head under the bright lights of the World Cup, and one camera clearly came out on top. CNET tested the Motorola Razr Fold and Razr Ultra at the men’s football tournament, where Motorola served as the official smartphone partner. The Razr Ultra’s advanced camera system delivered sharper action shots, richer colours, and better low-light performance than its more affordable sibling, making it the winner for photography enthusiasts. The World Cup provided a unique proving ground for these foldable phones, pushing their cameras to capture fast-moving players, varying lighting conditions, and high-contrast stadium environments. Motorola’s partnership with FIFA placed its foldables in the hands of thousands of fans and media, offering real-world validation that foldable cameras can compete with traditional slabs. In head-to-head testing, the Razr Ultra’s primary 50MP sensor and dedicated 2x telephoto lens consistently outperformed the Razr Fold’s 64MP main shooter, especially in zoom and night scenes. The Ultra also showed faster autofocus when tracking athletes sprinting across the pitch. While both phones share a similar design language, the camera stack is the decisive differentiator: the Ultra adds optical stabilisation and a wider aperture, capturing more light even under stadium floodlights. Industry analysts note that Motorola’s commitment to foldable cameras signals a shift – the form factor is no longer just a gimmick but a tool for serious mobile photography. As foldable prices drop and camera tech matures, more users may choose a Razr over a traditional flagship for its portability and unique shooting angles. Looking ahead, Motorola is expected to refine its camera algorithms further, potentially incorporating AI scene detection and improved video stabilisation in next-gen Razr models. The World Cup test proves that Motorola’s foldables have arrived as genuine camera contenders, a trend worth watching as the foldable market grows.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Motorola Razr Ultra has the better camera, thanks to its 50MP main sensor, 2x optical zoom, and superior low-light performance compared to the Razr Fold. In CNET's World Cup test, the Ultra consistently produced sharper and more vibrant photos.

Both Razr models handle sports photography adequately, but the Razr Ultra excels with faster autofocus and better stabilization. The dedicated telephoto lens captures distant action more clearly than the Razr Fold's digital zoom.

Yes, if camera quality is a priority. The Razr Ultra costs about $300 more than the Razr Fold but adds optical zoom, OIS, and a wider aperture, resulting in noticeably better photos in challenging conditions.

The main difference is the telephoto lens on the Razr Ultra, which offers 2x optical zoom, and its optical image stabilization. The Razr Fold relies on a higher-megapixel sensor but lacks dedicated zoom and stabilization.

Increasingly, yes. The Razr Ultra's camera performance at the World Cup shows that foldables can match mid-range to high-end slab phones in daylight and even low light, though they still lag behind top-tier devices like the iPhone Pro or Galaxy S Ultra.

Original source

www.cnet.com

Read original

Discussion

Join the discussion

Sign in to post a comment or reply.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Sign in
Enter your email to receive a one-time sign-in code. No password needed.
Email address