Russians Unimpressed As Putin Claims His Missiles Missed On Purpose
Putin says that recent Oreshnik hypersonic missile launches were not even fired at military targets, just at empty spaces as a test. Russian bloggers are furious.
- Putin stated on state television that recent Oreshnik hypersonic missile launches targeted 'empty spaces,' not military objectives, contradicting earlier claims of successful strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure.
- At least three prominent Russian military bloggers, including Andrei 'Murz' Morozov (800,000+ followers), expressed anger and accused the Kremlin of lying about battlefield successes.
- The Oreshnik hypersonic missile, promoted as Russia's unstoppable superweapon, travels at Mach 10 and has been used in multiple combat launches since 2025; this is the first official admission of non-combat tests.
- The backlash occurred within 48 hours of Putin's televised interview, forcing the Kremlin into a rare defensive posture and prompting unconfirmed reports of internal debates among security advisors.
- NATO analysts at the Royal United Services Institute estimate that if the missiles truly missed military targets, Russia may have only a handful of operationally reliable Oreshnik units, far fewer than publicly claimed.
Putin told state television that the June 2026 Oreshnik missile tests were not aimed at actual military installations, describing them as “technical demonstrations” against empty fields. The statement contradicts earlier official reports that the missiles struck critical Ukrainian infrastructure and military depots. Russian military bloggers, who have built large followings on Telegram and other platforms, reacted with outrage, accusing the Kremlin of covering up failures and wasting resources.
The Oreshnik is Russia’s newest hypersonic weapon, capable of traveling at Mach 10 and evading most air defenses. Moscow has heavily promoted it as unstoppable, with multiple combat launches in Ukraine over the past year. Putin’s admission that recent launches were merely “tests against empty ground” has stunned even loyalist commentators, who had celebrated the strikes as evidence of battlefield superiority.
Key figures include Andrei “Murz” Morozov, a prominent military blogger with over 800,000 followers, who wrote: “Either our leadership is lying about military successes, or our missiles cannot hit moving targets. Both are catastrophic for morale.” The Russian defense ministry has not commented on the backlash. Analysts at the Royal United Services Institute noted that Putin’s remark may have been an attempt to lower expectations ahead of a stalled offensive, but instead exposed the gap between propaganda and reality.
The implications extend beyond Ukraine. Hypersonic missiles are a cornerstone of Russia’s strategic deterrent; if even these advanced weapons are being used for “demonstrations” rather than combat, it raises questions about Russia’s overall military effectiveness. NATO officials have privately expressed skepticism about the Oreshnik’s capabilities for months. Putin’s own words now lend credibility to those doubts.
Looking ahead, Russian officials may try to walk back the statement or reframe it as a warning to the West. However, with domestic fury already boiling over, the Kremlin faces a rare test of its information control. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy quickly seized on the remark, calling it “a rare moment of honesty.” The next few days will show whether Putin doubles down or retreats into silence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Putin stated on state television that recent Oreshnik hypersonic missile launches were intentionally aimed at empty spaces, not military targets, contradicting earlier claims of successful strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure.
Russian military bloggers view the admission as either a cover-up for technical failures or a waste of expensive missiles. They argue it undermines morale and exposes the gap between Kremlin propaganda and battlefield reality.
The Oreshnik is Russia's newest hypersonic missile, capable of Mach 10 speed and designed to evade advanced air defenses. It has been heavily promoted as a game-changing weapon and used in multiple combat roles since 2025.
According to Putin's own statement, the Oreshnik missiles were not aimed at any military target; they hit empty spaces. This suggests either the missiles were never intended to strike real objectives or they lacked the accuracy to do so.
Analysts suggest Putin may have been trying to lower expectations for a stalled offensive or project restraint. However, the domestic backlash indicates the move backfired, exposing vulnerabilities in Russia's military narrative.
While state-controlled media initially downplayed the remark, independent and semi-independent bloggers have driven widespread criticism. Pro-war nationalists feel betrayed, and trust in official war updates has eroded further.
Topics
Original source
www.forbes.com
Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to post a comment or reply.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!