JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds Review: Lower Price and Enticing Improvements
JBL's Tour Pro 3 earbuds initially seemed overpriced. But now that they're being discounted and have earned a CNET Labs award for best frequency response, they're easier to recommend.
- JBL Tour Pro 3 earbuds originally priced at $249, now discounted to ~$199 at major retailers.
- CNET Labs awarded the Tour Pro 3 'best frequency response' among wireless earbuds tested in 2025.
- Earbuds feature 10mm dynamic drivers, adaptive noise cancellation, and 8-hour battery life per charge.
- Price cut brings them $50 below flagship competitors Sony WF-1000XM5 and Apple AirPods Pro 2.
- JBL's companion app provides customizable EQ, spatial audio, and firmware updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
The JBL Tour Pro 3 earned a CNET Labs award for best frequency response among wireless earbuds, indicating excellent audio balance across lows, mids, and highs. They also feature adaptive noise cancellation, multipoint Bluetooth, and a companion app with EQ tuning.
The JBL Tour Pro 3 originally launched at $249, but current street prices have dropped to around $199 at major retailers like Amazon and Best Buy. The discount may be temporary.
Yes, especially at the discounted price of $199. They offer award-winning frequency response, solid noise cancellation, and good battery life, competing well with pricier models like the Sony WF-1000XM5 and Apple AirPods Pro 2.
The earbuds provide up to 8 hours of playback per charge, with an additional 24 hours from the charging case. Fast charging gives 4 hours of use from a 15-minute charge.
At $199, the Tour Pro 3 undercut the Sony WF-1000XM5 and Apple AirPods Pro 2 by $50 while matching or exceeding their frequency response. Their adaptive noise cancellation is competitive, though Sony is slightly better in ANC. The JBL app offers more EQ customization.
CNET Labs awarded the JBL Tour Pro 3 best frequency response among wireless earbuds tested in 2025. This is based on objective measurements of frequency range, distortion, and unit-to-unit consistency.
Topics
Original source
www.cnet.com
Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to post a comment or reply.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!