Business Leaders Concerned About ‘Disorderly Climate Transition’
Business leaders see sustainability as a source competitiveness but are still concerned about the risks of a ‘disorderly climate transition’, according to a new survey.
- Sustainability is increasingly seen by business leaders as a vital competitive advantage for long-term growth and brand reputation.
- Concerns about a 'disorderly climate transition' stem from abrupt regulatory changes, policy inconsistency, and potential stranded assets.
- A disorderly transition could lead to severe economic disruption, including sudden carbon price jumps, supply chain shocks, and asset devaluations.
- Business leaders are calling for clear, predictable climate policies to enable stable investment in low-carbon technologies and processes.
- The survey from Forbes ties into a larger global debate on how to balance decarbonisation urgency with economic stability.
Conducted in mid-2026, the Forbes survey polled executives across major industries globally. It found that sustainability is now widely viewed as a source of long-term competitiveness, with companies investing in renewable energy, circular supply chains, and net-zero pledges. However, the same leaders express deep concern that the transition to a low-carbon economy could be disorderly — meaning sudden, uneven, and costly.
The concept of a 'disorderly climate transition' refers to a scenario where climate action is delayed and then rushed, leading to sharp regulatory changes, stranded assets, and financial shocks. Unlike an orderly transition managed over decades, a disorderly one could trigger economic instability, market volatility, and competitive disruption. The survey underscores that business leaders are bracing for this possibility.
Key details are limited from the Forbes report, but the finding aligns with broader research. For instance, the World Economic Forum and McKinsey have both highlighted that late and abrupt decarbonization could hike costs by up to 50% for some sectors. The insurance industry has already started pricing in transition risks. The survey likely reflects sentiments from CEOs of Fortune 500 companies, SMEs, and sustainability chiefs.
The analysis suggests that the tension between competitiveness and risk stems from policy uncertainty. Governments worldwide are setting net-zero targets but often lack coherent implementation plans. Carbon pricing, subsidies, and regulations vary by jurisdiction, making it hard for companies to invest confidently. Business leaders want a clear, predictable framework to avoid the 'stop-start' disruption that erodes returns and jobs.
Looking ahead, the next milestone will be the COP conference later this year, where nations are expected to set new targets under the Paris Agreement. Companies are likely to push for harmonized carbon accounting and more supportive public investment. If policy remains fragmented, the risk of a disorderly transition will only grow, forcing businesses to hedge bets rather than fully commit to green transformation.
Frequently Asked Questions
A disorderly climate transition refers to a scenario where climate action is delayed and then implemented abruptly, leading to sudden regulatory changes, economic shocks, and market volatility. It contrasts with an orderly, predictable shift over decades.
Business leaders fear that a disorderly transition could cause stranded assets, higher carbon costs, supply chain disruptions, and unstable investment environments. Without clear policies, companies struggle to plan long-term green investments.
Companies can prepare by diversifying energy sources, stress-testing portfolios against rapid policy changes, investing in flexible technologies, and actively engaging with policymakers to shape predictable regulations.
An orderly climate transition is gradual, with consistent policies and market signals, allowing businesses to adapt cost-effectively. A disorderly transition is abrupt, often due to delayed action, resulting in higher costs, regulatory chaos, and financial instability.
The Forbes survey polls executives across industries on their views regarding sustainability as a competitive advantage and their concerns about transition risks. It captures the dual sentiment of opportunity versus fear of disruption.
Topics
Original source
www.forbes.com
Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to post a comment or reply.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!