ClareNow
Search
ClareNow
Toggle sidebar
Technology → Neutral

10 Jobs That Are Safe Because Robots Cost Too Much

Maybe your job is safe from the robots just because you're cheap, and they're expensive. But maybe that won't last forever ...

Forbes 3 min read 6/10
10 Jobs That Are Safe Because Robots Cost Too Much
Key Takeaways
  • The Forbes article identifies 10 jobs safe from automation based on robot cost, not skill complexity.
  • Median wage for an electrician is ~$60,000/year, versus $200,000+ for a capable robotic replacement.
  • Robot prices have fallen: collaborative robot arms dropped from $100,000 to under $20,000 in a decade.
  • Goldman Sachs estimates 300 million jobs could be displaced by AI, but cost slows actual replacement.
  • Humanoid robots like Boston Dynamics' Atlas cost over $150,000, making low-wage service roles uneconomical to automate.
Is your job safe from the robot takeover? Perhaps, but only because paying a human is cheaper than buying and maintaining a machine. A Forbes article by John Koetsier highlights 10 jobs that remain secure due to the simple economic truth that robots cost too much — for now. The piece warns that this safety window may not last forever, as declining robot prices and advancing AI shift the math.

The lead insight: many blue-collar and service roles require dexterity, judgment, and adaptability that current robots lack, and the upfront investment in automation often exceeds the cost of human labor. For example, an electrician earns a median $60,000 annually, while a comparable robotic system might cost $200,000 plus maintenance. Similarly, plumbers, childcare providers, and landscapers perform tasks in unstructured environments that are prohibitively expensive to automate.

Context: Automation fears have surged in the AI era, with Goldman Sachs estimating that 300 million jobs could be displaced. Yet economic reality tempers the panic. Robots are not merely expensive to buy — they require programming, supervision, and repair, driving total cost of ownership well above a human worker's salary in many fields. The University of Oxford's Carl Benedikt Frey notes that about half of US jobs are at risk, but the pace of substitution depends on cost.

Key details: The Forbes list includes electricians, plumbers, childcare providers, landscapers, and cooks, among others. These roles demand fine motor skills, adaptability to irregular spaces, and social interaction. For instance, a human cook can improvise with varied ingredients, while a robot chef needs precise programming. The upfront cost of a humanoid robot from Boston Dynamics exceeds $150,000, whereas a minimum-wage cook costs roughly $30,000 per year. The gap narrows only when robot prices drop or wages rise.

Analysis: The cost barrier may be temporary. Robot prices are falling: a collaborative robot arm cost $100,000 a decade ago; now under $20,000. AI improvements in vision and dexterity will make robots more capable. Yet for roles demanding high adaptability or human trust — like childcare or elder care — the premium on human empathy may persist. David Autor, an MIT economist, argues that automation tends to raise the value of roles that require human judgment and interpersonal skills.

Outlook: Workers in these 'safe' jobs should not rest easy. The same Forbes article hints that robots cost too much today, but tomorrow's economics could flip. As battery costs, AI chips, and mass production scale down, the threshold for replacing humans will lower. The best defense is to develop skills that complement automation, such as creative problem-solving and complex communication. For the near future, though, your job may be safe — because you are still cheaper than the machine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Robots require high upfront purchase costs (hundreds of thousands of dollars), plus ongoing maintenance, programming, and supervision. For many low-wage, variable tasks, hiring a human remains cheaper than the total cost of ownership of a robotic system.

Forbes lists 10 jobs including electricians, plumbers, childcare providers, landscapers, cooks, and janitors. These roles require adaptability, fine motor skills, and often human trust or empathy that robots cannot economically replicate at current prices.

Yes. Robot prices have been falling steadily — collaborative arms dropped from $100,000 to under $20,000 in a decade. As AI chips and mass manufacturing scale, the threshold for economically replacing human workers will likely lower, reducing the safety window.

A humanoid robot like Boston Dynamics' Atlas costs over $150,000, while a minimum-wage cook costs ~$30,000 per year. Even cheaper collaborative arms cost $20,000, but require integration and oversight that add to the total.

Industries that demand high dexterity, unstructured environments, and social interaction — such as construction repair, childcare, elder care, and food preparation — have lower automation risk because robots cost too much today for these complex tasks.

Original source

www.forbes.com

Read original

Discussion

Join the discussion

Sign in to post a comment or reply.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Sign in
Enter your email to receive a one-time sign-in code. No password needed.
Email address